This is a Single Point link, or quick commentary on the article or page linked above. (Follow the title link above to the source for full background on the commentary below).

Published on February 6, 2011 10:57 AM by dbo.

It is obvious that the re-positioning of this project relates to making it palatable for a federal contribution. Inner-city development was never mentioned in any stadium articles before but now it is the forgotten impetus behind the project. The feds have $1 billion to spend and they are aligned ideologically with the Saskatchewan government, so this is just a laying of groundwork to allow their investment in a “community building” project. Political spin and ego projects hurt the case for replacing our infrastructure that has always been publicly owned and provided great return.

Let me be clear. I support refurbishment or new stadium in Regina. I do not support a $430 million (cost sure to rise) domed stadium when Winnipeg, Ottawa, Hamilton have developed their plans with greater constraints. I know many Reginans believe it is time they got their $100 million from the feds and a dome with year-round use provides the business plan to make it work. I just think it is a case of the underdog shooting for the moon when they don’t even need to reach orbit.

Conversation

Comments are closed. Continue the conversation on Twitter.

Meta

Re-positioning Regina's Stadium Bid was published on February 6, 2011 10:57 AM by dbo.

This link is tagged with regina and stadiums.