This is a Single Point link, or quick commentary on the article or page linked above. (Follow the title link above to the source for full background on the commentary below).
Published on June 22, 2010 10:11 PM by dbo.
Wasn’t putting the park back in the Park part of the criteria, Clive? Funny how Mr. Doucet uses a different mantra every day. It’s about the commercial development, it’s about sole sourcing, it’s about keeping the park public, it’s about turning it into a park. Basically it is about a politician who can’t itemize his position and plan, but sure can play the politics of opposition.
Please Ottawa, if you decide you don’t want a stadium, vote against the current collaboration and knock down the stadium, but don’t create a stadium that will be good for nothing, keep the parking lot for the Exhibition and add a little retail and call it the best plan. At least if the stadium is gone there won’t be debate about building new when half a stadium is still standing.